Science vs Conspiracy
据近日Political scientists 的“科学”分析, 从威州,到芝加哥再到波特兰,搅得大众黑白难辨的事,两报一刊上都头头是道地划分清非科学即阴谋。
谈到疫情,最近的MIT Tech Review 摘录Sweden’s State epidemiologist Anders Tegnell,”We still don’t at this stage see the obvious need for everyone to wear a mask… But it is very difficult to measure of face masks in a population.” 可见戴不戴口罩都可在美国上纲上线到非科学即阴谋的地步,不知这科学理论是否能强加他国?
情急中,美国科学家们迫不及待对Race, ethnicity and heritage 进行科学分析,分析它/它们是否具备政治正确性?可惜对同一简单的事,两亿半人的自由看法各不相同,如何去套用Science / Conspiracy 的绝对性去适应某个“政治正确”性?
Science vs Conspiracy
据近日Political scientists 的“科学”分析, 从威州,到芝加哥再到波特兰,搅得大众黑白难辨的事,两报一刊上都头头是道地划分清非科学即阴谋。
谈到疫情,最近的MIT Tech Review 摘录Sweden’s State epidemiologist Anders Tegnell,”We still don’t at this stage see the obvious need for everyone to wear a mask… But it is very difficult to measure of face masks in a population.” 可见戴不戴口罩都可在美国上纲上线到非科学即阴谋的地步,不知这科学理论是否能强加他国?
情急中,美国科学家们迫不及待对Race, ethnicity and heritage 进行科学分析,分析它/它们是否具备政治正确性?可惜对同一简单的事,两亿半人的自由看法各不相同,如何去套用Science / Conspiracy 的绝对性去适应某个“政治正确”性?